Operations room where analysts review a live smart-grid attack model on a video wall, with transmission infrastructure visible through the windows

AI-native attack modeling platform

Operational Attack Modeling for Real Systems.

From Architecture to Attack Paths, Controls, Detections, and Evidence.

AttackModeling.com helps security, cloud, and OT teams model how systems can be attacked, validate defensive coverage, and produce evidence that survives review.

Request Demo View Platform

Model the Attack. Validate the Defense. Export the Evidence.

Smart-grid network topology with a highlighted attack path

Attack Reasoning

Generate attack paths, attack trees, attacker objectives, and technique mappings from architecture context.

Control and detection coverage overlaid across infrastructure

Defensive Coverage

Connect modeled attack paths to controls, detections, mitigations, and validation exercises.

Structured evidence pack presented over architecture imagery

Evidence Production

Export structured evidence for architecture reviews, risk assessments, audits, and security leadership.

Platform

A Platform for Operational Attack Modeling

Four connected capabilities take a system from description to governed, reviewable attack model — with every step traceable to the reasoning behind it.

Composer

Generate structured attack models from descriptions, diagrams, templates, or architecture notes.

We operate a regional smart grid with SCADA, substations, RTUs, DERMS, Active Directory, and vendor VPN access…

16 attack paths 12 ICS techniques 5 open assumptions

Model Intelligence

Map attack paths to ATT&CK, ATT&CK for ICS, CAPEC, D3FEND, IEC 62443, NIST CSF, and internal controls.

Unauthorized command message ATT&CK for ICS T0855

IEC 62443 SR 3.8 NIST CSF PR.AA

Seven frameworks, plus your own control libraries.

Model Operations

Version, review, compare, approve, and maintain attack models across teams.

v3.0 · archived v3.1 · reviewed v3.2 · approved by 2 reviewers

Comparison: v3.2 adds vendor VPN scope — 3 new paths, 2 controls affected.

Model Validation

Generate detection ideas, test cases, tabletop scenarios, purple-team exercises, and evidence packs.

Detection test — unauthorized configuration changePassed

Tabletop — vendor VPN compromiseRun

Purple team — SCADA command sequenceScheduled

Enterprise operations room where analysts review a living attack model

Why operational attack modeling

Built for Systems Where Cyber Compromise Becomes Physical Consequence

Most modeling workflows stop once the diagram is drawn. Real security programs need models that stay connected to assets, adversary behavior, control coverage, detection logic, open assumptions, and validation status.

Assetsaligned with what is actually deployed

Adversary behaviormapped to current techniques

Controls and detectionstracked with coverage and gaps

Validationexercised, recorded, and reviewable

Attack reasoning

Smart Grid Attack Reasoning Map

How the platform sees one environment: infrastructure, the modeled attack path, and the reasoning layer that turns it into coverage, validation, and evidence.

Hover over a node to trace its connections.

Vendor VPN Active Directory Cloud Reporting Control Center Engineering Workstation SCADA / HMI Historian DERMS Substation RTU / IED Smart Meters Open Assumption Attack Path Detection Coverage Control Mapping Validation Evidence Pack

Modeled attack path Entry point Reasoning and coverage Assumption boundary

From description to model

From a Smart-Grid Description to a Reviewable Attack Model

Input

“We operate a regional smart grid environment with SCADA, substations, RTUs/IEDs, smart meters, DERMS, Active Directory, vendor VPN access, engineering workstations, historian servers, and cloud reporting.”

Attack Reasoning

Vendor VPN to Active Directory path
Engineering workstation compromise path
SCADA / HMI access path
Substation RTU/IED manipulation scenario
DERMS and smart-meter trust boundary issue
Loss-of-view and unauthorized switching consequence

Detection and Defense

Remote access anomaly
Privilege escalation indicator
Engineering workstation session review
SCADA command sequence review
Unauthorized configuration-change detection
Segmentation and MFA control mapping
Out-of-band operational validation

Governance and Standards

ATT&CK for ICS mapping
IEC 62443 mapping
NIST CSF mapping
NERC CIP / utility compliance mapping
Open assumptions requiring review
Validation exercises
Evidence pack export

Everything the model could not verify is flagged as an open assumption and routed to a human reviewer — never silently assumed.

Evidence Packs

Turn Attack Models Into Audit-Ready Evidence

Export structured evidence showing what was modeled, what assumptions were made, which attack paths were identified, which controls exist, where detection gaps remain, and how the model was validated.

Written for CISOs and security leadership. Structured for auditors and GRC teams. Machine-readable for architects and OT risk owners.

AttackModeling.com · Confidential

Attack Modeling Evidence Pack

Regional smart grid · Model v3.2 · Approved by 2 reviewers

Scopep. 2

System assumptions5 open

Attack paths16

Technique mappingsATT&CK · ICS

Control coverage31 mapped

Detection gaps7

Validation steps9 of 12

Open risks3

Export historysigned

Enterprise

Governed Attack Modeling for Enterprise Teams

Attack modeling becomes defensible when it is governed: who modeled what, who reviewed it, what changed, and what evidence left the building. The platform is built to pass the same security review and procurement scrutiny as the systems it models.

Single sign-onSAML, OIDC, SCIM provisioning

Role-based accessper workspace, model, and export

Audit logsevery read, edit, approval, export

API accessmodels and evidence as data

Private workspacesisolation per site or program

Custom control librariesmodel against your controls

Review workflowscomments, approvals, sign-off

Evidence exportsstructured, versioned, signed

Compliance reportingframework coverage across the estate

Executive dashboardsexposure, coverage, validation trends

Enterprise-Ready Architecture Evidence-Ready Workflows Private Deployment Options Security Review Support Standards-Aware Modeling Human-Reviewed Assumptions

Integrations